The Hidden Cost of Phasing Out Gas Cars

by | Dec 7, 2023 | Opinion

Guest post by John Lore

In recent years, the progressive push to phase out gasoline-powered vehicles in favor of electric ones has been gaining momentum, often touted as a necessary step to protect the environment and combat climate change. While environmental stewardship is undoubtedly crucial, from a libertarian perspective, this movement raises significant concerns about its broader implications, especially on the mobility and financial well-being of working and middle-class people.

The Burden of Cost on the Working and Middle Class

The core issue with the rapid phasing out of gas cars lies in the economic burden it places on average citizens. Currently, electric vehicles (EVs) carry a higher price tag compared to their gasoline counterparts, placing them out of reach for many in the working and middle classes. The push for a swift transition to EVs without a corresponding and realistic decrease in costs effectively marginalizes a significant portion of the population, making vehicle ownership—and the associated freedom of movement—increasingly exclusive.

Limiting Individual Freedom and Mobility

From a libertarian standpoint, freedom of movement is a fundamental right, integral to individual liberty. Owning a vehicle offers not just mobility but the freedom to live, work, and travel without reliance on state-controlled public transportation systems. By making vehicle ownership less accessible, the push to phase out gas cars can inadvertently lead to increased dependence on government services, limiting individual autonomy and choice—a scenario at odds with libertarian values.

Market Distortion and Lack of Choice

The push to phase out gas vehicles also represents a significant market distortion. A libertarian view advocates for a market where consumers drive demand and innovation, not top-down government mandates. The forced transition to EVs disrupts this natural market dynamic, limiting consumer choice and stifling innovation in traditional and alternative vehicle technologies that could potentially offer more affordable and efficient solutions.

The Environmental Argument and its Nuances

While the environmental benefits of EVs are often highlighted, the narrative oversimplifies a complex issue. The production and disposal of EV batteries, the source of electricity (often still fossil-fuel-based), and the rare earth materials required for their manufacture all pose environmental challenges. The libertarian approach favors a more holistic view of environmental impact, promoting diverse technological advancements in automotive efficiency, including but not limited to electric vehicles.

Infrastructure and Resource Limitations

The widespread adoption of EVs requires significant infrastructure investments, notably in charging stations, and an increased supply of electricity. Given the current limitations in many regions, the push for EVs might be premature and could lead to resource strain and increased utility costs, disproportionately affecting lower-income households.

Alternative Paths to Environmental Stewardship

Libertarians argue for alternative methods of environmental stewardship that do not impinge on individual freedom or economic viability. This includes encouraging market-driven innovations in vehicle technology, offering incentives for voluntary adoption of cleaner technologies, and ensuring a balanced and gradual transition to new forms of transportation that consider the financial impact on all societal segments.


In conclusion, while the intent to protect the environment is commendable, the progressive agenda to rapidly phase out gasoline-powered cars overlooks critical issues of economic feasibility, individual freedom, and market dynamics. From a libertarian perspective, it is crucial to balance environmental goals with the rights and freedoms of individuals, particularly the working and middle classes who stand to be most affected by these changes. A more measured, market-driven approach that values consumer choice and innovation could achieve environmental objectives without infringing on the fundamental liberties and economic well-being of the citizenry.

NEXT: Sharp: Ron DeSantis Appears to Have Purchased an Iowa Endorsement, But Will It Help?

AMP America

Get Amp’d in your inbox

Subscribe to our newsletter to get videos, articles, and more sent right to your inbox daily. 

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Share This